It's November 8th ...... ring any bells ? ref :- "A year in : U.S. stock market under Trump's shadow" , Reuters Markets
Time will tell just how just how much importance will be attached
to that date when they come to write the history books of this period, but
already it seems like an awfully big deal -- as everyone must have
suspected it would after the election of a populist outsider with his own way
of doing things, and with little regard to the conventions normally associated
with his position. Quite where Mr Trump's "America First"
protectionist bent will ultimately lead the world economy if pursued in full is
still anybody's guess, and as for his gung-ho approach to hugely dangerous
geopolitical developments ..... well, it's understandable if that's made some
observers a little edgy about the future.
We can see however how the markets have behaved over the last 365
days, and there's no doubt that the Trump agenda of tax cuts and reform, and
the promise of large-scale infrastructure spending (fiscal stimulus, in other
words), ignited a stock market rally that's still playing out. Ironically, the
shock of the Trump victory had the instantaneous effect of causing the Dow Jones
Industrial Average to slump 900 points, before a more considered view on what
his economic policies might mean for companies and markets overcame the other
misgivings about the incoming President. The Dow was to close up 250 points on
the day, above 18,500.
Since then the Dow has closed at a record high over 70 times and
finished last night at 23,557, just 45pts off the all-time high. The S&P
500 has posted 52 record high closes in calendar 2017 alone.
As we were only saying on Monday, Mr Trump is keen to take
personal credit for the stock market rally ..... and directly equates the
performance of Wall St with the health of the economy. Of course, they're not
always the same thing but on a narrow, rather simplistic level he is right. His
pro-growth, generally business-friendly policies -- or rather the expectation
of them -- have been a big factor in this rally. So too has his
push towards deregulation ..... the resurgence in stocks in the hugely influential
banking sector that would benefit from deregulation has been second only to the
all-conquering tech sector.
The trouble is that whilst attempting to gather all the plaudits,
Mr Trump may be missing some important points. He can't really take much credit
for the very strong corporate earnings reports in 2017 that have been the other
major driver of the market's climb. And even more fundamentally, the
administration may have promised the kind of policies that gets markets excited
but as we stand at the moment it is yet to actually deliver on any. There has
not been one major legislative victory (though there have been a number of
failures), and the whisper this morning is that the crucial tax-cutting bill
may be in a spot of bother, with talk about a one-year delay in the
all-important cut in corporation tax from 35% to 20%.
There has always been, and remains, a very fair chance that the
Tax Bill would not get through in the form put forward by the administration,
and theoretically mucking around with plans to cut corporation tax would
have to be a sizeable blow to corporates and their share price. Whether we'll
see any such concerns reflected in stock market performance is a moot point
however, such has been investors' ability to focus on the bright side. Even the
absence of any plan for infrastructure spending has failed to dampen investor
enthusiasm.That's been a bit of a mystery to those who keep looking for some
sort of pullback ..... which itself would not necessarily be entirely unhealthy
in the greater scheme of things.
Who knows ..... maybe the spectre of a government shutdown will
give the bulls pause for thought. The current spending deal, itself a
short-term sticking plaster, expires on Dec 8th and it would be fair to say
that at present Congress look a long way from making the numbers stack up.
Republicans and Democrats have very different priorities of course
-- the Mexican Wall versus the rights of young immigrants, to chose a
deliberately extreme example. Enough to stop the runaway train ? We'll see
.....
And whilst we're on what's happened since Mr Trump's victory,
what's happened in the bond market ? Pro-growth policies and fiscal spending,
and the inflationary pressures that they're expected to bring with them
(eventually), would naturally imply higher rates and yields. Even if inflation
is yet to bear its teeth, decent growth and very strong employment data has
duly encouraged the Fed to continue it's course of gradually tightening the Fed
Funds rate. The short end of the bond market has also played the role that one
might expect : the yield on the 2yr Treasury (1.63%) is the highest in over a
decade. Further down the curve it's a different story.
On Election day the 10yr Treasury yielded 1.86%. Little more than
a month later (15th Dec), the pro-growth, reflationary Trump agenda had pushed
the yield up to 2.60%, and it made a high of 2.63% on Mch 13th. The yield now ?
..... Back down to 2.30%.
The Fed may have started a gentle reduction of its balance sheet,
but the ECB and the Bank of Japan are still adding liquidity with their QE
programmes. The global search for yield makes US Treasuries much in demand,
which in turn pushes down yields.
We keep hearing from a number of bond market gurus that the end of
the great bullish bond market is nigh, and that yields are going to spike. But
breaks of technically important yield levels that were supposed to signal much
higher levels (2.40% , 2.60%) have so far let those gurus down. That's not to
say it won't happen, just that it may take irrefutable evidence of a solid
rebound in inflation before it does.
In the meantime, the contrasting fortunes of different maturities
in the bond market are doing strange things to the yield curve. The premium of
the yield of the 10yr Treasury over the 2yr is in to 67 basis points, or 0.67%.
That's the lowest for over a decade. It's not infallible, but flattening yield
curves are often the precursor to slowdowns in growth, and inverted yield
curves (short-term yields higher than longer-term) are taken as a harbinger of
full-on recession. Now that's a possibility that definitely wouldn't have
been on Mr Trump's agenda.
No comments