Get out the bunting and the party balloons, OPEC's done a deal! Or is it a bit premature.....?
Thursday 29th September 2016
Get out the bunting and the party balloons, OPEC's done a deal!
Or is it a bit premature.....?
ref:- " OPEC Agrees to First Oil Output Cut in Eight Years
" and others on Bloomberg Markets
Well, they didn't see that one coming ..... 21 of 23 oil market
analysts questioned by Bloomberg before OPEC's informal get-together in Algiers
had dismissed the idea that members might reach an agreement to cut production
this time around. You have to applaud the remaining two as a plan to
lower OPEC's output to between 32.5 and 33 million barrels per day was
announced, sending prices higher by about 6% and no doubt putting a smile back
on the faces of oil industry executives.
The sharp market reaction and the sight of traders scrambling for
cover revealed how just sceptical they had been that OPEC would be ready
to show the cooperative spirit required to forge an agreement. It's hard to be
too critical ..... scepticism has become something of a default position
when it comes OPEC-watching in recent times, for us as much as the next man. We
did say a couple of weeks ago that we felt a deal was closer, but can't
pretend that we thought it likely to come at the Algiers meeting.
So what does it mean? When the cut comes into effect, it means
that the lower end of the target range will equate roughly to a 750,000 bpd
drop from OPEC's August production level, according to their own numbers.
Assuming all goes according to plan, in time and IN THEORY that could translate
into a $7 - $10 rise in the cost of a barrel of oil according to Goldman
Sachs. It should be said in the interests of balance that it's not
a view shared by everyone, particularly if they consider that the
assumption is too big a one to rely on. If true though, it obviously means
better prospects for oil-producing countries large and small and for oil
companies -- it might even bring some more US shale firms back into
the game.
Most interestingly, it also means that Saudi Arabia has changed
its position regarding Iran. Whilst the Saudis and most other big OPEC
producers will obviously be subject to cuts, the Iranians will be exempt. This
represents a major concession from Riyadh , but may also be read as a measure
of the financial difficulties faced by the Saudis after such an extended period
of low prices. Former Oil Minister al-Naimi may have said that it didn't matter
if the Saudi-led pump-at-will policy led to $20, $40, $50 or $60 oil, but it
turns out that it DOES matter ..... a lot.
Saudi is poised to rack up a record budget deficit this year and has
been spending heavily out of foreign-exchange reserves. The
government has been forced to cut bonus payments to civil servants
and there is even anecdotal evidence of delays in payment of government
contracts. Don't misunderstand ..... it's not as though Saudi's issues should
be confused with the desperate problems facing the likes of Venezuela say, but
the extra revenue generated by higher oil prices for the sake of a small
production cut will be very welcome. Just in case anyone was in any doubt, that's
what's driving Riyadh's more accommodating stance towards Iran, and definitely
not any new-found warmth between the great regional rivals.
The deal signifies a return to "supply management" after
two dramatic years of a free-for-all in oil markets that has seen a crash in
prices. Many will be hoping that supply management = price management, but
of course it requires levels of demand to keep up with expectations for that to
be true. Nevertheless, in theory the deal does represent a fundamental change
in OPEC's strategy and you'd imagine that most producers will be thinking
"not before time".
So what are the potential problems?
As ever, there are plenty ..... the details of the agreement
-- who cuts and by how much, even who's allowed to pump a little more
-- will not be finalised until OPEC's November meeting. The possibility
of members being unable to agree on these details is a live one. And how
confident can we be that all parties will stick to their quotas? After all,
OPEC's history is not entirely reassuring on that front. Most fundamentally,
OPEC accounts for just 40% of global production -- will they be
able to persuade non-OPEC producers to show similar restraint? It's not much
good cutting your own output if the rest of the world just ups theirs.
Non-OPEC Russia is the biggest player in this. At present, they
are pumping oil like there's no tomorrow : initial estimates for Russia's
September production are put at 11.1 million barrels a day, easily a
post-Soviet era record and up 400,000 bpd from August. On the face of it,
Russia does not give the impression of a country planning to rein back output.
Or does it? Russia has been a significant broker between often discordant
voices within OPEC as the deal was being agreed, so perhaps we can assume that
they will play their part come November. It's very possible that they've ramped
up production just so they can show themselves willing and responsible by
announcing their own cuts to go alongside those of OPEC.
Who knows? There's no doubt that the oil market is a
more bullish place than it was 24hrs ago, but there's still a lot that can go
wrong and don't forget that the oil market is still a long way oversupplied. As
we write, prices are giving a little bit back this morning indicating a touch
of cold-eyed realism may be following last night's euphoria. Still ..... it's a
start, right?
No comments