Have you got your answer ready if someone asks you just what's going on?
Thursday 21st January
2016
Have you got your answer
ready if someone asks you just what's going on ?
ref :- "Stock
exchanges across the world plunge into bear market territory" , the
Financial Times, p.1
After days like
yesterday, already referred to in some quarters as "Black
Wednesday" (yes, another one ..... they'll soon need to be more
specific) , there's always a danger that someone might ask you out of blue what
your take is on why what's just happened, happened. That's a difficult
question given how many different factors are in play, all the more so
since most of them are linked, but if you don't want to come across as a total
fraud it may pay to have an answer to hand. Fortunately, it doesn't have to be
one full of inspirational insights and if you roll out a few of the more
straightforward and accepted areas of deep concern, you may just get away with
it. So, how about .....
1. China
2. Global economic
growth prospects
3. Sliding commodity
prices, especially OIL
4. Doubts over whether
central banks remain willing to act as a backstop
You may be unlucky
enough to have to explain your thinking. To take them in turn :
China ..... the
staggering growth in the economy over the last 25 years has been squarely based
on investment and infrastructure, but now has to change ..... after all, how
many dams can you build ? The move to an economy driven more by services
and consumers is a difficult one and a slow process , and it's not a
surprise that it's having a marked effect on Chinese growth. Q4 GDP was
recently released at 6.8%, giving an overall figure of 6.9% for 2015. This is
the lowest headline number for 25 years, and that's if you believe the
official data ..... many don't and would suggest the number might be nearer
5.0%.
Global economic growth
prospects ..... with China and the emerging nations it so directly affects to
the fore, the IMF has lowered its forecasts for global growth to : 3.4% in
2016, down from 3.6%, and 3.6% in 2017, down from 3.8%. World trade is tailing
off, best illustrated by the Baltic Dry Index -- a measure of the
cost of transporting goods by sea -- at a lifetime low (it was
set up in 1985).
Sliding commodity
prices, especially OIL ..... plainly falling prices are bad news for
commodity producers, but it's often asked why is the collapse in crude oil
viewed so negatively by the markets ? Surely most developed nations are net
importers and this should be a boost for growth ? Not so .... the
disinflationary effects of lower commodity prices are a real dampener for the
markets. Deflation encourages hoarding and discourages spending and investment.
Also, the emerging commodity producing nations are often largely reliant on
higher prices -- price falls can undermine the health of an entire
regional economy, and from a strictly market-perspective, provoke large scale
selling of overseas investments to enable the repatriation of funds to those
newly cash-strapped nations. And then there's the energy industry ......
Doubts over whether
central banks remain willing to act as a backstop ..... not just are they
willing to, but are they able to ? We've often spoken about how it shouldn't
be the job of a central bank to support asset prices. Nobody should wish
for a return to the days of the "Greenspan Put", when investors
thought themselves protected from losses by the strategy of the then Fed
Chairman Alan Greenspan of cutting rates to prop up prices. Nonetheless, it
would be seen as irresponsible for a central bank, and most particularly for
the Fed, to ignore the state of the global economy and market turmoil. The Fed's
December hike (and stated intentions to continue the path to higher
rates) would seem to signal to some that Fed will leave the markets
to find their own levels. And besides, with rates in so many developed nations
at near zero, and levels of other easing measures such as QE so high, how
much ammunition do central banks have left even if they wanted to help.
Hopefully that might do
it, but if you wanted to add a contrary note to proceedings you could mention a
couple of things :
re : China ....
the lowest GDP growth in 25 years may grab the headlines, but a little
perspective might be in order here. If something grows the same amount in
volume terms this year as it did last year, in percentage terms it will be a
lower figure -- that's just simple maths. So it is with China's
GDP. Paul Sheard, chief economist of Standard and Poors pointed out in
yesterday's FT that if China's GDP grew 6.3% this year (to pick a number LESS
than the official version), that would be the equivalent of about 14% growth in
2009, in terms of the increment to global GDP. Or to look at it another way,
taking the official data the growth in 2015 equated to more than the entire GDP
of Sweden, and to just a little less than that of Switzerland.
re : Doubts over Central
Banks ..... the divergence between rising rates in the US and easing elsewhere
will continue to be a theme in 2016. For emerging markets, higher US rates
and the consequently stronger dollar are a double-whammy, up to their eyes as
they are in dollar-denominated debt. Capital outflows from emerging
markets severely undermine their chances of a return to strong growth. But in
the current circumstances few believe that the Fed will be able to
implement four 25bp hikes this year, as they themselves have been
predicting. In fact, futures markets (and let's face it, the markets have been
much better than the Fed at forecasting lately) now suggest that the total of
25bp rate hikes we will see this year is .... just one.
Hope it helps....
No comments