"Normalisation of Deviance" ..... not a comment on the moral deterioration of mankind, but when applied to markets a pointer to possible catastrophe in the future....
Wednesday 22nd July 2015
"Normalisation of Deviance" ..... not a comment on the
moral deterioration of mankind, but when applied to markets a pointer to
possible catastrophe in the future....
"Electronic trading is out of control and heading for
disaster" by Philip Aldrick, The Times, p.43
Regulars will recognize that the subject of the dangers presented
by the use of computer algorithms and high-frequency trading programmes that
have come to dominate trading practices is not a new one for us. The catchy
phrase in the title may be however, and originally derives from an acceptance
of risk by NASA that ultimately led to the space shuttle disasters -- a
parallel that should certainly get most people's attention.
It's a global phenomenon, but to take the UK as an example ....
more than half the trades in equities, foreign exchange, government bond and
futures markets are executed automatically, with computers replacing the
"old-fashioned" methods of phone calls and human
decision-making.
At first glance, things might appear healthy enough. The spread
between bids and offers has never been tighter, and the numbers of orders give
the impression of a thoroughly liquid market. Sadly, experience should
have taught us that this is just an illusion. Computer-generated programmes
tend to switch themselves off in the face of what they might consider an
excessive move which renders their programme briefly redundant. Frankly, these
moves in themselves don't have to be particularly large by previous
standards but as the bids (almost always) and offers (conceivably) disappear,
huge "air-pockets" are left behind which inevitably leads to hugely
exaggerated price movements.
It's not as though we are short of recent examples, and in every
market. In May 2010, the US stock market fell by 10% in 36 minutes. In October
2014, US Treasuries crashed in five minutes. In January this year, the Swiss
Franc rose 28% (versus the Euro) in 20 minutes. And just this week, we've seen
another "flash crash" in Gold.
In each case there was a trigger for the move, but as Mr Aldrick points out
these triggers were relatively modest affairs. What would happen if a real
crisis occurred ? Some people might find it tempting to think that mature
markets tend to sort themselves out in quick time, and that these matters are
really only of interest to those in the financial markets. Tempting maybe, but
utterly misguided. To quote Mr
Aldrick again : "The 2007 credit crunch was caused by a
liquidity freeze, the catalyst for Northern Rock's nationalisation. With no one
trading, asset prices collapsed, punching huge holes in bank balance sheets.
Facing losses, they stopped lending and plunged the world into recession."
Get the picture ? The stakes couldn't be higher.....
It's not as though the authorities are unaware of the issue.
Senior officials at both the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England have
publicly acknowledged the problem but at the same effectively admitted that
they're not sure what to do about it. More study needed into the new market
dynamics seems to be the line. One can sympathise insofar as it's become
a very difficult problem to solve but surely they need to fully apply
themselves to it rather than just tinker around, and to do it right now .
Otherwise, another older phrase might apply .... something to do with
"fiddling" and "Rome burning."
No comments